12.2

Blackbody Radiation

Chapter contents: Chapter 12: Quantum Mechanics

Ultraviolet Catastrophe

A blackbody is an ideal absorber of all electromagnetic radiation incident on it. In thermal equilibrium it emits a spectrum determined by its temperature. This blackbody radiation is described by Planck’s law. Real objects can approximate this spectrum, but their emission also depends on their material and surface properties. The historical attempt to explain this spectrum using classical physics predicted too much radiation at short wavelengths. Resolving this problem helped launch quantum mechanics.
The blackbody radiation graph of E M radiation intensity versus wavelengths is shown, with the visible band represented as vertical colored strip marked on x axis. Wavelength is along x axis and E M radiation intensity is along y axis. The variation of E M radiation intensity is shown by three curves that start at origin, rise up to their highest point and then drop toward the x axis smoothly, and finally extend parallel to the x axis. There are three curves for three different temperatures, and each has a different peak for radiation intensity. As the temperature decreases, the peak of the black body radiation curves moves to a lower radiation intensity and longer wavelength. Another curve is shown for classical theory prediction at the highest temperature. For the classical theory curve, the intensity increases without limit at shorter and shorter wavelengths.
Figure 12.2.1. Graphs of blackbody radiation (from an ideal radiator) at three different radiator temperatures. The intensity or rate of radiation emission increases dramatically with temperature, and the peak of the spectrum shifts toward the visible and ultraviolet parts of the spectrum. The classical theory prediction is shown for the highest temperature, which shows intensity increasing without limit at short-wavelength limit. (Figure Credit: Darth Kule on Wikipedia)
This result came to be called ultraviolet catastrophe, due to the catastrophically large intensity of radiation predicted in the ultraviolet range of EM spectrum. This problem stumped many physicists until Max Planck came up with a novel suggestion.

Planck Law

The spectrum of blackbody radiation was extensively studied and well known. The German physicist Max Planck (1858–1947) first guessed a functional form of intensity dependence on the wavelength of EM radiation, which is now known as the Planck Law. The Planck Law was a good fit to the experimental results (shown in Figure 12.2.1), tapering off both at the long-wavelength and the short-wavelength limit, but it was only a phenomenological description that did not include a satisfying explanation of why it was so.
A photo of German physicist Max Plank is shown.
Figure 12.2.2. The German physicist Max Planck had a major influence on the early development of quantum mechanics, being the first to recognize that energy is sometimes quantized. Planck also made important contributions to special relativity and classical physics. (credit: Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division via Wikimedia Commons)
This led Planck to look for a reason why intensity of radiation should decrease at the short-wavelength, or high-frequency limit. Using the idea that atoms and molecules in a body act like oscillators to absorb and emit radiation, he guessed that the energy of these oscillators are quantized. That is, the energy of the oscillators could change only by a discrete amount, and this discrete amount of energy change was ΔE=hf, where f is frequency of the oscillator and h is a fundamental constant of nature that we now call Planck’s constant, given by
h=6.626× 10−34 J ⋅ s.
(12.2.1)
Without getting into the detailed mathematical derivation, we can see intuitively why this assumption would lead to the result that Planck was looking for. An object at thermal equilibrium has a certain amount of thermal energy, which is associated with kinetic energy of microscopic movements and vibrations. If this energy is randomly distributed, both very high-frequency oscillators and very low-frequency oscillators would have the same thermal energy on average. But if it was true that this thermal energy is quantized, and it has to come in integer units of hf, then at very high frequencies, there is not going to be enough thermal energy for even one unit of hf. This places an upper limit on maximum possible frequency of these oscillators, for a given amount of thermal energy per oscillator, resulting in the tapering behavior for intensity of radiation emitted by these oscillators at the higher frequency (or shorter wavelengths).
This model would also explain why the peak wavelength shifts to the shorter wavelength (higher frequency) at higher temperatures. At higher temperatures, there is more thermal energy available per oscillator, so the upper limit on maximum possible frequency will be higher, since larger unit size hf is allowed.
Note that Planck’s constant h is a very small number. So for an infrared frequency of 1014Hz being emitted by a blackbody, for example, the difference between energy levels is only ΔE=hf= (6.63 × 10−34 J·s)(1014 Hz)= 6.63 × 10−20 J, or about 0.4 eV. This 0.4 eV of energy is significant compared with typical atomic energies, which are on the order of an electron volt, or thermal energies, which are typically fractions of an electron volt. But on a macroscopic or classical scale, energies are typically on the order of joules. Even though the macroscopic energies are quantized, the quantum steps are too small to be noticed. This is an example of the correspondence principle. For a large object, quantum mechanics produces results indistinguishable from those of classical physics.
Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review. Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.
Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.