14.14

GUTs: The Unification of Forces

Chapter contents: Chapter 14: Nuclear and Particle Physics

Present quests to show that the four basic forces are different manifestations of a single unified force follow a long tradition. In the 19th century, the distinct electric and magnetic forces were shown to be intimately connected and are now collectively called the electromagnetic force. More recently, the weak nuclear force has been shown to be connected to the electromagnetic force in a manner suggesting that a theory may be constructed in which all four forces are unified. Certainly, there are similarities in how forces are transmitted by the exchange of carrier particles, and the carrier particles themselves (the gauge bosons in Table 14.13.1) are also similar in important ways. The analogy to the unification of electric and magnetic forces is quite good—the four forces are distinct under normal circumstances, but there are hints of connections even on the atomic scale, and there may be conditions under which the forces are intimately related and even indistinguishable. The search for a theory linking the strong and electroweak interactions, called a Grand Unified Theory (GUT), is explored in this section in the realm of particle physics.
Figure 14.14.1 is a Feynman diagram showing how the weak nuclear force is transmitted by the carrier particle Z0, similar to the diagrams in Figure 14.12.2 and Figure 14.12.3 for the electromagnetic and strong nuclear forces. In the 1960s, a gauge theory, called electroweak theory, was developed by Steven Weinberg, Sheldon Glashow, and Abdus Salam and proposed that the electromagnetic and weak forces are identical at sufficiently high energies. One of its predictions, in addition to describing both electromagnetic and weak force phenomena, was the existence of the W+,W−, and Z0 carrier particles. Not only were three particles having spin 1 predicted, the mass of the W+ and W− was predicted to be 81 GeV/c2, and that of the Z0 was predicted to be 90 GeV/c2. (Their masses had to be about 1000 times that of the pion, or about 100 GeV/c2, since the range of the weak force is about 1000 times less than the strong force carried by virtual pions.) In 1983, these carrier particles were observed at CERN with the predicted characteristics, including masses having the predicted values as seen in Table 14.13.1. This was another triumph of particle theory and experimental effort, resulting in the 1984 Nobel Prize to the experiment’s group leaders Carlo Rubbia and Simon van der Meer. Theorists Weinberg, Glashow, and Salam had already been honored with the 1979 Nobel Prize for other aspects of electroweak theory.
A Feynman diagram is shown in which time proceeds in along the vertical y axis and distance along the horizontal x axis. An electron and an electron neutrino are shown approaching each other, exchanging a virtual zee zero particle, then moving apart.
Figure 14.14.1. The exchange of a virtual Z0 carries the weak nuclear force between an electron and a neutrino in this Feynman diagram. The Z0 is one of the carrier particles for the weak nuclear force that has now been created in the laboratory with characteristics predicted by electroweak theory.
Although the weak nuclear force is very short ranged (<10−18m, as indicated in Table 14.12.1), its effects on atomic levels can be measured given the extreme precision of modern techniques. Since electrons spend some time in the nucleus, their energies are affected, and spectra can even indicate new aspects of the weak force, such as the possibility of other carrier particles. So systems many orders of magnitude larger than the range of the weak force supply evidence of electroweak unification in addition to evidence found at the particle scale.
Gluons (g) are the experimentally established carriers of the strong interaction between quarks. Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describes eight types of gluons, all massless and with spin 1. Gluons carry color charge and can interact with one another. Like quarks, they are confined within color-neutral combinations and are not observed as isolated particles. Their existence is established through experiments, including collisions that produce three jets of particles, corresponding to a quark, an antiquark, and a gluon.
Gluon exchange can change a quark’s color without changing its flavor. In Figure 14.14.2(b), a red down quark emits a red–antigreen gluon and becomes green. A green strange quark absorbs that gluon and becomes red. The quarks remain a down quark and a strange quark throughout the interaction.
Panel (a): a three-by-three color–anticolor grid. Six off-diagonal combinations form six gluon states. The three matched combinations form two gluon states, (red–antired minus green–antigreen)/square root of 2 and (red–antired plus green–antigreen minus twice blue–antiblue)/square root of 6. The equal sum of all three divided by square root of 3 is the color singlet, not a gluon. Shading groups states; it does not represent color charge.
(a)
Panel (b): original color-exchange diagram. A red down quark emits a red–antigreen gluon and becomes green. A green strange quark absorbs it and becomes red. Time runs upward; quark flavors remain unchanged.
Figure 14.14.2. (a) Nine color–anticolor combinations split into eight gluon states and one color singlet. Six unmatched combinations and two independent superpositions of matched combinations form the eight gluon states; the equal superposition of the three matched combinations is the singlet and is not a gluon. The shading groups states, and the plus and minus signs describe quantum amplitudes rather than mixing paint colors. (b) A red down quark and a green strange quark exchange a red–antigreen gluon, exchanging colors while retaining their flavors.
The strong force is complicated, since observable particles that feel the strong force (hadrons) contain multiple quarks. Figure 14.14.3 shows the quark and gluon details of pion exchange between a proton and a neutron as illustrated earlier in Figure 14.12.3. The quarks within the proton and neutron move along together exchanging gluons, until the proton and neutron get close together. As the u quark leaves the proton, a gluon creates a pair of virtual particles, a d quark and a d¯ antiquark. The d quark stays behind and the proton turns into a neutron, while the u and d¯ move together as a π+. The d¯ annihilates a d quark in the neutron, the u joins the neutron, and the neutron becomes a proton. A pion is exchanged and a force is transmitted.
The Feynman diagram shows a proton scattering from a neutron. In the process , the proton becomes a neutron and the neutron becomes a proton. The details of the interaction are explained in the text.
Figure 14.14.3. This Feynman diagram is the same interaction as shown in Figure 14.12.3, but it shows the quark and gluon details of the strong force interaction.
Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) describes the strong interaction between quarks and gluons. Together with electroweak theory, it forms the Standard Model of particle physics. This framework describes quarks and leptons, the particles that carry the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions, and the Higgs boson. Its predictions have passed many precise experimental tests. However, it does not include gravity or explain dark matter, so it remains an incomplete description of nature.

Making Connections: Unification of Forces

Electroweak theory and quantum chromodynamics are established parts of the Standard Model. Grand unified theories and superstring theories explore further unification that has not yet been experimentally established. Grand unified theories connect the strong and electroweak interactions at much higher energies; superstring theories pursue a broader framework that can also include gravity. Specific energy and length scales depend on the model.
How can forces be unified? They are definitely distinct under most circumstances, for example, being carried by different particles and having greatly different strengths. But experiments show that at extremely small distances, the strengths of the forces begin to become more similar. In fact, electroweak theory’s prediction of the W+, W−, and Z0 carrier particles was based on the strengths of the two forces being identical at extremely small distances as seen in Figure 14.14.4. As discussed in case of the creation of virtual particles for extremely short times, the small distances or short ranges correspond to the large masses of the carrier particles and the correspondingly large energies needed to create them. Thus, the energy scale on the horizontal axis of Figure 14.14.4 corresponds to smaller and smaller distances, with 100 GeV corresponding to approximately, 10−18m for example. At that distance, the strengths of the EM and weak forces are the same. To test physics at that distance, energies of about 100 GeV must be put into the system, and that is sufficient to create and release the W+, W−, and Z0 carrier particles. At energies much greater than their rest energies, the masses of the carrier particles can be neglected in some calculations. This does not mean that the particles become massless. Electroweak theory predicts a particle associated with the Higgs field, called the Higgs boson, but does not predict its mass. In 2012, the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider discovered this particle, with a mass of approximately 125GeV/c2. The discovery supports the Higgs mechanism, through which the W and Z bosons acquire mass while the photon remains massless.
The figure shows a graph with the strength of four basics forces plotted along the y axis and energy plotted along the x axis in giga electron volts. Near zero giga electron volts, the difference in forces is large. Gravity is the weakest force, followed by the weak force, then the electromagnetic force, and finally the strong force is the strongest. At about one hundred giga electron volts, the curves for the electromagnetic and weak force combine to become the electroweak force, but gravity remains weaker and the strong force remains stronger. Near ten to the fifteen giga electron volts, the electroweak force combines with the strong force at a point labeled G U T. Finally, at about ten to the nineteenth giga electron volts, gravity is combined with the electroweak plus strong force at a point labeled T O E.
Figure 14.14.4. The relative strengths of the four basic forces vary with distance and, hence, energy is needed to probe small distances. At ordinary energies (a few eV or less), the forces differ greatly as indicated in Table 14.12.1. However, at energies available at accelerators, the weak and EM forces become identical, or unified. Unfortunately, the energies at which the strong and electroweak forces become the same are unreachable even in principle at any conceivable accelerator. The universe may provide a laboratory, and nature may show effects at ordinary energies that give us clues about the validity of this graph.
Grand unified theories propose a common framework for the strong and electroweak interactions at energies far beyond those reached by current accelerators. Their characteristic energy and length scales depend on the model. Superstring theory pursues a broader framework in which fundamental particles correspond to different vibrational states of strings and which incorporates supersymmetry. Such frameworks can also include gravity.
Some grand unified theories predict interactions that can change baryon number and allow proton decay. The predicted lifetime and decay modes depend on the model. One proposed decay mode is
p→π0+e+, (proposed proton decay)
(14.14.1)
which violates conservation of baryon number and electron family number. Experiments search for such decays using large quantities of matter and have found no convincing evidence of proton decay. These searches place lower limits on the lifetime for particular decay modes and constrain proposed theories.
From looking increasingly inward at smaller details for direct evidence of electroweak theory and GUTs, we turn around and look to the universe for evidence of the unification of forces. In the 1920s, the expansion of the universe was discovered. Thinking backward in time, the universe must once have been very small, dense, and extremely hot. At a tiny fraction of a second after the fabled Big Bang, proposed unification processes might have left their fingerprint on the existing universe. The search for these fingerprints connects the physics of the smallest particles with the origin and evolution of the universe.
The image shows the picture of a huge cylindrical shaped proton decay detector with its main door open. It is as high as a double decker bus and as long as a small house. An untold number of cables, wires, and detector modules are arranged in a cylinder around a rectangular crate-like object containing another smaller cylindrical object.
Figure 14.14.5. In the Tevatron accelerator at Fermilab, protons and antiprotons collide at high energies, and some of those collisions could result in the production of a Higgs boson in association with a W boson. When the W boson decays to a high-energy lepton and a neutrino, the detector triggers on the lepton, whether it is an electron or a muon. (credit: D. J. Miller)
Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review. Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.
Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.Continue to this item in the chapter review.